🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of states are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our kids' innocence". The policy may be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to approve a bill lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a comparable move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is given. Although it warns of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a useful first step," said the parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on strong evidence".

Earlier, support gathered behind a bill to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised concerns. One foundation established by the family of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create tools that are secure and fit for children," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, regulation is primarily occurring at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a bill banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws demanding adult authorization for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of the West, further states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, world organizations adopt a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

Even as this global conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and others show that policymakers around the world are no longer willing to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.