🔗 Share this article

The nation's stunning new Museum of West African Art (Mowaa) has found itself in the center of local power politics during the week it was scheduled to – but failed – to open its doors to the general public for the very first time.

The Major Initiative

The six-hectare campus sits in the heart of Benin's urban center, capital of the southern region of Edo – and includes an historical dig and facilities planned by renowned Ghanaian-British architect Sir David Adjaye, particularly noted for the Smithsonian African American Museum that was inaugurated in Washington in 2016.

It has been half a decade in the creation – and is envisioned to showcase both the history and the current era of creativity in the area famous for the Benin Bronzes, artworks stolen from the king's palace by British troops in the 1800s.

Setup and Prospects

It is notable – and prior to the scheduled opening, Mowaa was active with staff committed to show it is a venue that can rival established museums and galleries in the Western world.

Within art restorers meticulously opened cultural items from protective packaging, inspecting each piece and taking thorough documentation before placing them on exhibition areas and plinths.

Technicians adjusted temperature regulation systems. In the materials science laboratory, staff members adjusted devices designed to conserve centuries-old items.

Funding and Economic Goals

The venture has been the idea of investor Phillip Ihenacho – presently Mowaa's executive director.

"I hope us to have a significant economic impact on local residents in the vicinity," he explained to media outlets, noting that he wanted to make the city "an arts hub."

Mowaa, a charitable local organization, aims at establishing more than 30,000 work positions and contributing more than $80m per year to the regional creative economy through collaborations and programming.

Investment and Administrative Problems

It has taken $25m to reach this point – capital raised from different contributors, such as the international partners, the London institution and the regional authorities.

But at present the local government has revoked permission from under it – canceling the use of the land on which the museum was built.

An Edo state spokesperson stated this was because in the initial documents it had referred to itself as the Edo-named institution – and it had since dropped "the state identifier" from its designation.

Demonstrations and Government Action

This announcement came after rallies on the weekend, when people stormed the campus demanding it be named the Benin Royal Museum.

A disruptive group confronted international visitors at the venue before the opening – requiring them to be quickly removed under police escort.

National leader Bola Tinubu has also become involved to work to address the dispute, establishing a high-level committee to do some damage control.

Political Complexities

But how has this become so controversial – and such a PR disaster?

The majority of it results from local power struggles at a regional government level, as it was the former state leader Godwin Obaseki – whose administration concluded the previous year – who was a major backer of the initiative.

And it looks like the administration of the new governor, a strong supporter of the area king, referred to as the royal figure, may desire increased control in the initiative. The demonstrators on Sunday, for example, were demanding that the institution be positioned under the control of the royal leader.

The Cultural Artifacts Debate

This emphasizes the controversial matter of the historical artworks, one of the region's most renowned artistic heritage.

Because though the institution does finally open, these bronzes will be noticeably missing.

They are brass, ivory and timber sculptures that once embellished the monarch's home of the Benin Kingdom before UK forces looted them in 1897 during a colonial invasion.

Nowadays, many stay spread across galleries in Europe and North America -- including the British Museum, European center and the New York institution.

Repatriation Campaigns

Their return has become one of the most disputed debates in the international art community. Approximately 150 have presently made their way home – and more are due to follow.

When plans for the institution in the urban center were first announced in the pre-pandemic era, the movers and shakers on the national arts community expected it would become their ideal location – a advanced complex to show them off to the global audience.

But the waters were muddied some time back after the national authorities announced that the traditional ruler would be the legal custodian of returned objects – and the royal household campaigned for a institution under the monarch's supervision, against the wishes of the former governor.

Political Navigation

This placed Mowaa in a delicate position: expressing a clear stance on repatriation while remaining diplomatic on ownership – and stressing its broader vision, which led to|c